logoSave our Selsey

Campaign for Coastal Defence

SOS - November  2010

'Medmerry Scheme' Planning Application to be heard

At the end of this month the planning application for the Medmerry managed realignment should be heard by Chichester District Council’s planning committee.  

The “Medmerry scheme” is the plan to build new defences to protect the low-lying west of Selsey from coastal flooding. This involves building about 7km of new inland flood banks, starting at the western end of West Sands caravan park, sweeping nearly 3km inland, then curving back again to meet the coast next to the Bracklesham caravan park.  

Once the flood banks are built, the area will be deliberately flooded by punching a hole (a “breach”) in the existing shingle beach. This would allow the sea to flood into the new area in a controlled way, and over time new salt marshes would form there. The remaining beach would be left to itself – it’s forecast it would gradually flatten and migrate landwards.

 If planning consent is granted, the main works should start in October 2011, and the breach would be made in autumn 2012. Most local organisations involved as “stakeholders” in the run-up to this scheme (including SOS) have finally given it the “thumbs up”, but with various provisos. Our concerns have included (a) whether the defences will work in the way the computer models have predicted, and (b) the future maintenance of these inland flood banks - although the Environment Agency will be “responsible” for maintenance, this doesn’t guarantee it will have the money to do it.

 This brings us back to a recurring theme – the funding arrangements for this, and the Town’s other sea defences (sea walls, groynes etc). Successive governments have made it very clear that future funding for Selsey is “unlikely”, once the current West Beach and Medmerry works are done. That was the position even before the financial crisis.

 By the time you read this the government should have announced the cuts to departmental budgets, including DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural affairs). Broadly speaking, it’s DEFRA money that kept our sea defences going. We expect the probability of getting DEFRA coastal defence money will slip from a polite “unlikely” to a more honest “not on your Nellie”!

 Hence the need to find alternative ways to get funding - or make the money necessary - to keep our defences maintained. Maintain them we must. If in doubt, look at the maps (published as part of the Shoreline Management Plan) showing what would happen to Selsey if we don’t... losing most of the Oval Field to erosion would be the least of our problems! With this backdrop, we as a community need to accept that exploring for alternative funding mechanisms has become essential.